This is Your Brain on North Korea

It's ethically gross and difficult to stomach, but the most strategic way to prevent disaster with North Korea is direct contact and diplomacy-- we've got to treat Kim Jong-un like a real world leader, or at least pretend to do so-- because the possession of nuclear weapons commands this treatment, whether we like it or not . . . the possession of a nuclear weapon breaks down whatever ethical system you're using to solve the problem (aside from utilitarianistic realpolitik) because problems at the end of the spectrum nearly always break down categorical principles . . . very few people get hung up on whether a human or an amoeba possess more civil rights, but when you get to the fringe and compare the consciousness of a healthy chimpanzee and the consciousness of 97 year old man on life-support, things get more difficult . . . no one wants to abort and kill an eight month old baby, but the consequence of using a morning after pill is something more difficult to define . . . torture is most definitely wrong, but if you need a piece of information to avert nuclear war, then things that might be normally considered morally repugnant might be heroic . . . it's these places, moral quandaries at the edges, where ethical systems break down; there's nothing that feels morally right, and you just need to figure out things on a case by case basis; North Korea is one of these problems-- threats are useless because the ball is literally in their court-- we're the good guys and we don't use nuclear weapons cavalierly, sanctions don't work when the leadership of country doesn't care what suffering their citizens endure, and brinksmanship is too risky because it could cause a nuclear disaster, or a breakdown of the regime, in which nuclear weapons could get into random hands or disappear or worse . . . so it's time to suck it up and do what's right, even though it feels very wrong, because it's existential crisis and we've only got one earth, there's no control group, no A/B testing, and we can't risk it (unless, of course, you're some kind of religious nut, who truly believes in the afterlife . . . then you can pursue your principles without fear, punish the wicked as a matter of recourse, and know that all things will be sorted out during the rapture).

4 comments:

zman said...

Do you think there's a high school teacher/blogger in North Korea writing "we've got to treat Donald Trump like a real world leader, or at least pretend to do so"?

Whitney said...

Dave, your last two posts have been startlingly insightful and lucid. Your one from yesterday should be shared across social media; you borrow the principles from Eric Hoffer, but they are highly pertinent and worth considering for those who would try to understand the seemingly incomprehensible.

So is Catherine writing these posts for you?

Dave said...

catherine is away! obviously she's the one screwing up my consciousness!

Dave said...

and yes zman, that north korean civics teacher definitely exists, although he doesn't blog it, he writes it on the back of matchbook and leaves it under a table in a busy restaurant. that's how you express your opinions there.

A New Sentence Every Day, Hand Crafted from the Finest Corinthian Leather.